<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0 Conference Lacks Value</title>
	<atom:link href="http://renato.mascardo.com/2007/04/17/web-20-conference-lacks-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://renato.mascardo.com/2007/04/17/web-20-conference-lacks-value/</link>
	<description>Technology, Business, Entreprenuership, Family and Humor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 18:19:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://renato.mascardo.com/2007/04/17/web-20-conference-lacks-value/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renato.mascardo.com/2007/04/17/web-20-conference-lacks-value/#comment-89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree...at least for Monday.  I attended Monday and Tuesday and found Tuesday&#039;s sessions much more informative.  Granted, I went to the show to see how we might make use of some of the Web2.0 concepts in enterprise software. 

Specifically, I attended good sessions on Effective Tagging, Blogging for Business, Adobe Apollo, and Coghead.  The whole concept of incorporating social networking into the context of enterprise content management will be a very hot topic in my world.  I really like Flex as a UI framework, and Adobe holds some interesting promise as a deployment mechanism.

IBM was the only heavy hitter from the enterprise space who was exhibiting. That, coupled with the same general lack of enterprise commentary, definitely makes me think Web2.0 has yet to meet Enterprise 2.0.

Oh yeah, I liked the Bezos - O&#039;Reilly exchange.  Hats off to Bezos for not bopping the host right in the nose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree&#8230;at least for Monday.  I attended Monday and Tuesday and found Tuesday&#8217;s sessions much more informative.  Granted, I went to the show to see how we might make use of some of the Web2.0 concepts in enterprise software. </p>
<p>Specifically, I attended good sessions on Effective Tagging, Blogging for Business, Adobe Apollo, and Coghead.  The whole concept of incorporating social networking into the context of enterprise content management will be a very hot topic in my world.  I really like Flex as a UI framework, and Adobe holds some interesting promise as a deployment mechanism.</p>
<p>IBM was the only heavy hitter from the enterprise space who was exhibiting. That, coupled with the same general lack of enterprise commentary, definitely makes me think Web2.0 has yet to meet Enterprise 2.0.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, I liked the Bezos &#8211; O&#8217;Reilly exchange.  Hats off to Bezos for not bopping the host right in the nose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cw</title>
		<link>http://renato.mascardo.com/2007/04/17/web-20-conference-lacks-value/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renato.mascardo.com/2007/04/17/web-20-conference-lacks-value/#comment-14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the internet is progressing faster than we allow ourselves. it seems. at least as far as the last note you made.
nice post!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the internet is progressing faster than we allow ourselves. it seems. at least as far as the last note you made.<br />
nice post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

